EU Watchdog Proposes Crypto Fines of 12.5% of Annual Revenue
cyberinktimes.com · post 60176 · 2026-06-28
The European Banking Authority wants to be able to take 12.5 percent of a crypto firm’s annual revenue. That is the headline number in the consultation paper it published on June 26. But the real story is simpler and starker: the era of crypto companies policing themselves inside the European Union is finished.
The framework, once finalized, gives regulators a clear arithmetic for calculating penalties. No more haggling.
No more wrist slaps that amount to rounding errors on a balance sheet. The stakes here are not abstract. They are tied directly to the credibility of the entire Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, known as MiCA.
This is the world’s first comprehensive regime for digital assets. It forces token issuers and service providers to operate with bank-like compliance, consumer protections, and capital reserves if they want access to the single European market.
That is a huge ask. Without an enforcement mechanism that hurts, MiCA becomes a paper tiger. The EBA’s proposal is the teeth.
Consider the two-step process the Paris-based watchdog laid out. Regulators will first assess the baseline severity of an infraction. Then they factor in aggravating or mitigating behavior.
It is a standardized playbook. That matters because crypto firms have operated across 27 member states with wildly different enforcement cultures.
One country’s slap on the wrist was another’s fine. Now there is one arithmetic. Non-compliant issuers of what the EBA considers “significant” tokens face potentially multimillion-euro penalties.
The 12.5 percent figure is not pulled from air. It is tied to annual revenue.
For a significant token issuer doing real business, that is a painful number. It is designed to be. The consultation paper, published June 28 according to the report, makes explicit that the framework applies to significant token issuers specifically.
These are the players that matter most to market stability and consumer exposure. What is genuinely at risk is the flow of institutional capital. MiCA was years in the making.
Its entire design philosophy was to impose order on a sector haunted by scandals and collapses. The hope was that clear rules would attract big money from pension funds, asset managers, and banks that have stayed on the sidelines.
But institutional investors are risk-averse. They need to know the rules are real. They need to know that if a token issuer breaks the rules, the regulator will act with predictable force.
The EBA’s framework is the signal that force is coming. The wider picture is regulatory convergence.
The report notes the U.S. administration under President D — the text cuts off there, but the direction is clear. Europe is not acting in a vacuum. Other jurisdictions are watching.
If MiCA’s enforcement proves credible, it becomes a template. If it fails, the entire regulatory project for crypto globally takes a hit. The EBA’s proposal is now in consultation.
That means industry feedback, lobbying, and likely some adjustments. But the direction is set.
The era of self-policing in crypto is over. That is the warning shot from the corridors of European finance. The question is whether the industry hears it.
{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “NewsArticle”, “headline”: “EU Watchdog Proposes Crypto Fines of 12.5% of Annual Revenue”, “description”: “The European Banking Authority wants to be able to take 12.5 percent of a crypto firm’s annual revenue. That is the headline number in the…”, “datePublished”: “2026-06-28T10:48:00+00:00T09:30:00+00:00”, “author”: {“@type”: “Person”, “name”: “Beatrice Ferrari”}, “publisher”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “InfoPulse Today”, “url”: “https://newsfeed.infopulsetoday.com/”}}